عنوان مقاله [English]
Among the new movements in the field of urban transportation, aimed at promoting pedestrian staging in the city and reducing vehicle dominance, are pedestrian-oriented and policies of making pedestrian street. However, the implementation of pedestrian streets in different cities has been accompanied by a variety of results; To the point where some pedestrian streets have failed and they have been opened again on the cars. In the present study, the evaluation of the policies used in the southern khayyam pedestrian street of urmia projects is being addressed. In this study, the analysis and evaluation of the strategies and policies used in the southern khayyam pedestrian street and the comparative analogy with the standard components and standards of pedestrian spaces attempts to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the axis and to solve its deficiencies. The research method is descriptive-analytical and based on documentary and field studies. In order to make a better comparison, Friedman's test has been used to rank the criteria and criteria. The results of the study indicate that southern khayyam pedestrian street quality is moderate and in some criteria it is not favorable. paying attention to the needs of the stakeholders, diversifying the design and creation of facilities for attracting different users, flexibility of the plan, decisive handling of unauthorized motorcycles and the like, The use of indigenous patterns with the cultural and historical context is one of the ways in which they can create more vibrant, more relaxing pedestrian walkways.