تحلیل مضمون مطالبات حق به شهر ساکنان شهر جدید پردیس

نوع مقاله : مقاله استخراج از رساله و پایان نامه

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری گروه علوم اجتماعی - پژوهشگری، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران

2 استاد، گروه علوم اجتماعی - پژوهشگری، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران

3 دانشیار، گروه علوم اجتماعی، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران.

چکیده

تهران تبدیل به آهنربایی شده است که غیر از آدم ها، شهرها را هم به سمت خود می کشاند و شاید به جای مهاجرت آدم ها، باید از مهاجرتِ شهرها صحبت کرد. شهرهای جدید بزرگی در اطراف تهران ساخته شده اند. این پژوهش در پی مطالعه میدانی زندگی روزمره ساکنان شهر جدید پردیس در ابعاد و مولفه های حق به شهر می باشد و هدف اصلی آن بیان و تحلیل مشکلات و مطالبات اصلی حق به شهر ساکنان شهر جدید پردیس می باشد که زندگی در این شهر را دشوار کرده است و یا موجب نارضایتی ساکنان شده است. پژوهش حاضر با روش کیفی اجرا شده است و تعداد 22 مصاحبه عمیق با روش نمونه گیری هدفمند با ساکنان شهر پردیس صورت گرفته است و  از روش تحلیل مضمون براون و کلارک (2006) برای کدگذاری داده ها و پیدا کردن مضامین استفاده شده است و به دنبال درک و استخراج مفاهیم و مطالبات حق به شهر ساکنان شهر جدید پردیس بوده است. در مجموع 8 مضمون اصلی برای مضمون فراگیر حق به شهر در شهر جدید پردیس شناسایی شد که با تعدادی مضمون فرعی حمایت شده است. این مضمون های اصلی شامل: 1. حمل و نقل عمومی دشوار 2. عملکرد ضعیف شرکت عمران شهر جدید پردیس. 3. تعامل سرد. 4.دسترسی پایین به خدمات شهری. 5. نابرابری. 6. وابستگی شهری به مادرشهر. 7. تراکم مجتمع ها و خانه های خالی. 8. مهاجرت روزانه شاغلان، بوده است. وابستگی شهر جدید پردیس به مادرشهر تهران موجب تقسیم حق به شهر ساکنان با تهران شده و کمبود فرصت شغلی و حمل و نقل ضعیف، دو تعیین کننده بسیار مهم حق به شهر در پردیس می باشند که دیگر حقوق ساکنان را تحت تأثیر شدید قرار داده اند و بر تعاملات اجتماعی بیشترین تأثیر را داشته و زمینه نظارت همسایه ها را کمتر کرده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Thematic Analysis of the Demands of the Right to the City Between the Residents of the New City of Pardis

نویسندگان [English]

  • Nima Jafari 1
  • mahmoud sharepour 2
  • Yaghoob Foroutan 3
1 Ph.D. student, Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran
3 Associate Professor of Demography, Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran
چکیده [English]

Big new cities have been built around Tehran. This research follows the field study of the daily life of the residents of the new city of Pardis in the dimensions and components of the right to the city, and its main purpose is to express and analyze the main problems and demands of the residents of the new city of Pardis, which make life in this city difficult or has caused the dissatisfaction of the residents. The current research was carried out using a qualitative method, and 22 in-depth interviews were conducted with the residents of Pardis city using the purposeful sampling method. In the current research, Brown and Clark’s (2006) thematic analysis method was used to code data and find themes and sought to understand and extract concepts and deficiencies of the rights to the city of the residents of the new city of Pardis. A total of eight main themes were identified for the overarching theme of the right to the city in the new campus city, which is supported by several sub-themes. These main themes include: 1. Difficult public transportation, 2. Poor performance of the architecture company in the new city of Pardis, 3. Cold interaction, 4. Low access to urban services, 5. Inequality, 6. Urban dependence on the mother city, 7. Density of complexes and empty houses, and 8. Daily migration of workers. The dependence of the new city of Pardis on the mother city of Tehran has caused the residents' right to the city to be divided with Tehran, and the lack of job opportunities and poor transportation are two very important determinants of the right to the city in Pardis, which have severely affected the other rights of the residents and has had the most significant impact on social interactions and has reduced the scope of monitoring neighbors.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Right to the city
  • new city of Pardis
  • urban independence
  • access to city services
  • easy transportation
 
Alaedini, P. & Jamshidinasab, M. (2015). Mehr Housing and New Communities’ Right to the City: A Case Study of the Parand Project. Local development,13, 241-258 (in Persian).
Average, C. (2019). Whose Right are Rights to the City:an overvIew. International Journal of Politics and Good Governance, Volume X, No. 10.2 Quarter II.
Baker, T., (1999).   Doing social research, Nayebi, H., (2007). Ney publication (in Persian).
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Brenner, N. Marcuse, P.  Mayer, M. (2012) Cities for People, Not for Profit, Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City. Abdollahzadeh, M. (2019). Cultural Research Office publication (in Persian).
Flangan, W.G. (2010). Urban Sociology, Images and structure. Fifth Editon.usa.rowman & littlefield publication.
Flik, U. (2006). An introduction to qualitative research, sage publication. Jalili, H,.(1387) Ney publication(in Persian).
Garoosi, S. &Shamsodini, M. (2013). Perception of social justice in terms of citizens' access to services urban (case study: Kerman city). Urban sociological studies,9:41-46 (in Persian).
Ghadiri, M. & Hekmatnia, H. & Rajabi, Z (2019). Spatial balance analysis of access to urban services, Case study: Eqlid city. Scientific Quarterly Journal of Social Development Welfare Planning,40:115-145(in Persian).
Goodarzi, M. & Nemti, M. & Firoozi, M. & Saeedi, O (2018). Investigation and analysis of economic obstacles to the development of public transportin Shahrahawaz metropolis. Research approaches in social sciences,14,65-78(in Persian).
Gottdiener, M. & Hutchison, R. (2010). The new urban sociology. Westview Press, ; 4th edition.
Harvey, H. (2020). The Anti-Capitalist Chronicles. Pluto Press, London.
Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel Cities: from the right to the city to the urban revolution. london, Verso publication.
Harvey, D. (1993). Social Justice and City. Basil Blackwell.Oxford.UK.
Lefebvre, Henri (2003). The Urban Rrvolution. London: University Of Minnesota Press.
Mayer, M. (2006). Manuel Castells’The City and the Grassroots. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research.Volume 30.1:202–206.
Mayer, M. (2009). The “Right to the City” in the context of shifting mottos of urban social movements. City, 13(2-3), 362–374.
Merrifield, A. (2011). The right to the city and beyond. City, 15(3-4), 473–481.
Middleton, J. (2016). The socialities of everyday urban walking and the “right to the city.” Urban Studies, 55(2), 296–315.
Purcell, M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal, 58(2/3), 99–108.
Rafiyan, M., & Alvandipour, F. (2015). Conceptualization of the idea of the right to the city, In search of a conceptual model, Iran Sociological Journal, 2,25-47. (in Persian).
Rahbari, L. (2014). Gender and the right to the city. Sociology doctoral thesis, Mazandaran University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (in Persian).
Saldana, J, (2015) The coding manual for qualitative researchers. sage publication. Givian. A. (2016). Elmi va farhangi publication (in Persian).
Sá, T. H. de, Edwards, P., Pereira, R. H. M., & Monteiro, C. A. (2019). Right to the city and human mobility transition: The case of São Paulo. Cities, 87, 60–67. 
Shahabadi, z. & Gholami, M. (2019). Examining the relationship between the sense of right to the city and legalism. Urban sociological studies,32,33-56 (in Persian).
Shokoohi, M. & Farokhloo, M. & Khazaeinejad, F. (2011). Effective factors in the populability of new satellite cities (case study: Andisheh New City). Researches of human geography,79, 75-86(in Persian).
Yasouri, M. & Hataminejad, H, & Asadzadeh, H. (2015). Analysis of the Causes and Circumstances of Tehran Centralization in the Past Three Decades. Research and urban planning, 47,315-336 (in Persian).