تحلیل عوامل زیست‌پذیری فضاهای میانی ساختمان‌های بلندمرتبه به-منظور تحقق توسعه پایدار

نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری شهرسازی، دانشگاه تهران، پردیس بین الملل کیش. ایران

2 استادیار، گروه معماری، دانشکده هنر و معماری، واحد شیراز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شیراز، ایران

3 کارشناس ارشد، گروه جغرافیا، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران

4 دانشجوی دکتری.گروه جغرافیا، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

بلندمرتبه‌سازی به عنوان یکی از روش‌های توسعه شهری و استفاده بهینه از فضاهای محدود، همواره مورد توجه بسیاری از معماران، طراحان و برنامه‌ریزان شهری بوده‌است. این نوع توسعه به‌تدریج از کاربری‌های اقتصادی به کاربری‌های مسکونی نیز گسترش یافته و مناطق پیرامونی شهرها را تحت تأثیر قرار داده‌است. با این‌حال، آنچه اغلب نادیده گرفته می‌شود، فضاهای میان ساختمان‌های بلندمرتبه است. بی‌توجهی به این فضاها می‌تواند منجر به کاهش کیفیت زندگی شهروندان می‌گردد. از آنجاییکه امروزه سیاست‌های شهری در راستای اهداف و اصول توسعه پایدار هستند، هدف این پژوهش تحلیل و بررسی متغیرهای زیست‌پذیری در فضاهای میان ساختمان‌های بلند‌مرتبه به منظور تحقق توسعه پایدار در شهرک گلستان سمنان است. روش مطالعه توصیفی-تحلیلی و از نظر هدف کاربردی است و در آن رابطه علی و معلولی بررسی می‌شود. متغیرهای زیست‌پذیری در پنج بعد دسترسی، کالبدی و کاربری، زیست‌محیطی، تاسیسات و تجهیزات شهری و اجتماعی تدوین گردیده است. جهت گردآوری داده‌ها از پرسشنامه استفاده گردید که توسط 18 متخصص تکمیل شده است. جهت تحلیل پرسشنامه‌ها از روش ساختاری-تفسیری با کمک نرم افزار میک مک استفاده شد. متغیرهای زیست‌پذیری در فضای میان ساختمان‌های بلندمرتبه در پنج گروه متغیرهای دو وجهی (امنیت، روشنایی عملکردی و فضای سبز، مبلمان شهری، کاربری تفریحی و تعاملات اجتماعی)، مستقل (دسترسی به پارکینگ، دسترسی به ایستگاه حمل‌ونقل عمومی، فقدان آلودگی هوا، توالت عمومی و ایمنی)، تاثیرگذار (دسترسی به پارک، فقدان آلودگی هوا و بوی مطبوع)، تنظیمی (تئاتر روباز، کف‌سازی و فقدان آلودگی مواد جامد) و تاثیرپذیر (خوانایی) تبیین شده‌اند. متغیرهای امنیت، روشنایی عملکردی، دسترسی به پارک، مبلمان شهری و فضای سبز بیشترین تاثیرگذاری و متغیرهای متغیرهای خوانایی و ایمنی به ترتیب کمترین میزان اثرگذاری در تحقق زیست‌پذیری در فضای میان ساختمان‌های بلندمرتبه شهرک گلستان سمنان را دارند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Livability Analyzing the Factors in the Interstitial Space of High-Rise Buildings for Sustainable Development

نویسندگان [English]

  • AMIRHOSSEIN TAKMIL 1
  • Maryam Haghpanah 2
  • Simin abdollahzade 3
  • fatemeh alizadehvandchali 4
1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Urban Planning, University of Tehran, Kish International Campus. Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
3 M.A., Department of Geography, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.
4 Ph.D. Student, Department of Geography, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Science and Research Unit, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

High-rise buildings, specifically high-rise construction, have always been the focus of many architects, designers, and urban planners; so, the policies related to the use of high-rise construction methods gradually included residential uses in addition to economic uses and spread to the surrounding areas of cities. However, the spaces between high-rise buildings are often ignored. Neglecting these spaces will lead to a decrease in the quality of life. Therefore, an attempt is made to help manage these spaces by benefiting from livability components. On the other hand, considering that today's urban policies align with the goals and principles of sustainable development, this research aims to analyze the livability factors in the interstitial space of high-rise buildings for sustainable development: Golestan Town of Semnan. This study examined theoretical studies of 18 variables in five dimensions: access, physical and use, ecology, urban facilities and equipment, and social dimension. A questionnaire was used to collect data, which was completed by 18 experts. The structural-interpretive method was used with the help of Mic Mac software to analyze the questionnaires. The variables were explained in four groups of two-faceted variables (goal and risk): independent, influential, regulatory, and influenceable. Influential variables include access to the park, a lack of air pollution, and a pleasant smell. Two-faceted variables (risk) include security, functional lighting, and green space. The objective includes urban furniture, recreational use, and social interactions; influential variables, including legibility; independent variables, including access to parking, access to public transportation stations, lack of air pollution, public toilets, and safety; and finally, regulatory variables, including open-air theater, floors, and the formation and absence of solid material contamination, were identified. The variables of security, functional lighting, access to the park, urban furniture, and green space have the most influence, and the variables of readability and safety have the least influence, respectively.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • High-rise building
  • livability
  • sustainable development
  • structural-interpretive method
  • Golestan Semnan settlement
 
Afryan, R., & Roychansyah, M. S. (2019). Livability Level As A Guideline Of Arrangement Of Suprapto Road City Walk Corridor In Bengkulu City. Journal of Architectural Research and Design Studies, 3(1), 24-37. https://doi.org/10.20885/jars.vol3.iss1.art3
Ahmed, N. O., El-Halafawy, A. M., & Amin, A. M. (2019). A critical review of urban livability. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1), 165-182. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2019.v8n1p165
Anabestani, Aliakbar, Javanshir, Mahdi, & Anabestani, Zahra. (2015). Adaptive Comparson of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methids in Optimal Locating of Tall Builfings (Case study: Region 9 Mashhad Municipality). JOURNAL OF SPATIAL PLANNING, 5(3 (18)), 1-24. SID. (In persian) 20.1001.1.22287485.1394.5.3.1.6
Abdelkarim, S. B., Ahmad, A. M., Ferwati, S., & Naji, K. (2023). Urban Facility Management Improving Livability through Smart Public Spaces in Smart Sustainable Cities. Sustainability, 15(23), 16257.
Al-Thani, S. K., Amato, A., Koç, M., & Al-Ghamdi, S. G. (2019). Urban sustainability and livability: an analysis of Doha’s urban-form and possible mitigation strategies. Sustainability, 11(3), 786.
Al-Kodmany, K. (2012). Guidelines for tall buildings development. International Journal of High-Rise Buildings, 1(4), 255-269.
https://doi.org/10.21022/IJHRB.2012.1.4.255
Behzadipour, Hamed. Daudpur, Venus. Zabihi, Hossein. (2021). Analyzing the relationship between high-rise buildings and citizens' environmental perception using the spatial arrangement method, case study: District 22 of Tehran. ArmanShahr architecture and urban planning. No. 37. pp. 163-151. (In persian)  10.22034/AAUD.2021.238919.2253
Baig, F., Rana, I. A., & Talpur, M. A. H. (2019). Determining factors influencing residents’ satisfaction regarding urban livability in Pakistan. International Journal of Community well-being, 2, 91-110.
Campbell, c. (2013). VISUALIZING RESIDUAL SPACES IN A NEW LIGHT A Study for Creating & Designing an Urban Public Space Under a Downtown San José Freeway. A Planning Report Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Urban and Regional Planning San José State University.
https://www.sjsu.edu/urbanplanning/docs/honors-reports/URBP%20298%20-%20Honors%20Report%20-%20Campbell.pdf
Del Mar Martínez-Bravo, M., Martínez-del-Río, J., & Antolín-López, R. (2019). Trade-offs among urban sustainability, pollution and livability in European cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 224, 651-660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.110
Dietrich, U., & Kengyel, N. (2016). What makes a public open space liveable? WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 204, 685-696. https://www.witpress.com/elibrary/wit-transactions-on-ecology-and-the-environment/204/35698
Elsawy, A. A., Ayad, H. M., & Saadallah, D. (2019). Assessing livability of residential streets–case study: el-Attarin, Alexandria, Egypt. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58(2), 745-755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2019.06.005
Frumkin, H., Bratman, G. N., Breslow, S. J., Cochran, B., Kahn Jr, P. H., Lawler, J. J., ... & Wood, S. A. (2017). Nature contact and human health: A research agenda. Environmental health perspectives, 125(7), 075001. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1663
FoadMarashi, M., & Serdoura, F. (2021). Public Space Use: An Approach to Livability in Urmia Bazaar, Iran. In Formal Methods in Architecture: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Formal Methods in Architecture (5FMA), Lisbon 2020 (pp. 231-240). Springer International Publishing.
https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-030-57509-0_21
Fu, B., Yu, D., & Zhang, Y. (2019). The livable urban landscape: GIS and remote sensing extracted land use assessment for urban livability in Changchun Proper, China. Land Use Policy, 87, 104048.    
Ford, L., & Ford, L. R. (2000). The spaces between buildings. JHU Press. (https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Spaces_Between_Buildings.html?id=f1o4bAdQigcC)
Gentin, S. (2011). Outdoor recreation and ethnicity in Europe—A review. Urban forestry & Urban greening, 10(3), 153-161.
Gough, M. Z. (2015). Reconciling livability and sustainability: Conceptual and practical implications for planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 35(2), 145-160.
Hamraie, A. (2020). Alterlivability: Speculative Design Fiction and the Urban Good Life in Starhawk’s Fifth Sacred Thing and City of Refuge. Environmental Humanities, 12(2), 407-430.  https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-8623197
HATAMINEJAD, HOSSEIN, & NAJAFI, ESMAEIL. (2018). Investigating and Spatial-Temporal Analysis of Pick-Pocketing Hotspots in the City of Semnan. JOURNAL OF URBAN SOCIAL GEOGRAPHY, 5(1 (12) ), 121-137. (In persian)
https://doi.org/ 10.22103/JUSG.2018.1965
Jacobs, J. (2016). The death and life of great American cities. Vintage.
(https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/30833.The_Death_and_Life_of_Great_American_Cities)
 Jaszczak, A., Kristianova, K., Wasilewska, O., & Dunisijevic-Bojovic, D. (2020). Concepts of" Biophilia" and" Livability" in the context of social perception of public space in cities. Przestrzeń i Forma, (42), 133-146. https://doi.org/10.21005/pif.2020.42.C-02
Kovacs-Györi, A., Cabrera-Barona, P., Resch, B., Mehaffy, M., & Blaschke, T. (2019). Assessing and representing livability through the analysis of residential preference. Sustainability, 11(18), 4934.
Liu, J., Nijkamp, P., Huang, X., & Lin, D. (2017). Urban livability and tourism development in China: Analysis of sustainable development by means of spatial panel data. Habitat international, 68, 99-107.
Miles, M. (2004). Legibility and liveability: a critique. Perspectivas Urbanas/Urban Perspectives. 2004, núm. 5.
https://raco.cat/index.php/Perspectivas/article/view/85004
Miller, H. J., Witlox, F., & Tribby, C. P. (2013). Developing context-sensitive livability indicators for transportation planning: a measurement framework. Journal of Transport Geography, 26, 51-64.
Mouratidis, K., & Yiannakou, A. (2022). What makes cities livable? Determinants of neighborhood satisfaction and neighborhood happiness in different contexts. Land use policy, 112, 105855.
Mushtaha, E., Alsyouf, I., Al Labadi, L., Hamad, R., Khatib, N., & Al Mutawa, M. (2020). Application of AHP and a mathematical index to estimate livability in tourist districts: The case of Al Qasba in Sharjah. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 9(4), 872-889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2020.04.001
Norwood, M. F., Lakhani, A., Fullagar, S., Maujean, A., Downes, M., Byrne, J., ... & Kendall, E. (2019). A narrative and systematic review of the behavioural, cognitive and emotional effects of passive nature exposure on young people: Evidence for prescribing change. Landscape and Urban Planning, 189, 71-79.
Omuta, G. E. (1988). The quality of urban life and the perception of livability: A case study of neighbourhoods in Benin City, Nigeria. Social Indicators Research, 20(4), 417-440. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302336
Okulicz-Kozaryn, A., & Valente, R. R. (2019). Livability and subjective well-being across European cities. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 14(1), 197-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-017-9587-7
Paul, A. (2020). Developing a methodology for assessing livability potential: Evidence from a metropolitan urban agglomeration (MUA) in Kolkata, India. Habitat International, 105, 102263.
Pal, S., Raj, R., & Anbukumar, S. (2021). Comparative study of wind induced mutual interference effects on square and fish-plan shape tall buildings. Sādhanā, 46(2), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01592-6S
Rakonjac, I., Zorić, A., Rakonjac, I., Milošević, J., Marić, J., & Furundžić, D. (2022). Increasing the livability of open public spaces during nighttime: The importance of lighting in waterfront areas. Sustainability, 14(10), 6058.
Ranjbarnia, Behzad, Raushi, Shahrivar, and Pourmohammadi, Mohammadreza. (2017). Analysis of factors affecting sustainable urban development with an emphasis on the digital divide, using the Mick McFuzzy method (case study: Tabriz 2018). Human Geography Research (Geographic Research), 50(4), 891-905. (In persian).
Rakonjac, I., Zorić, A., Rakonjac, I., Milošević, J., Marić, J., & Furundžić, D. (2022). Increasing the livability of open public spaces during nighttime: The importance of lighting in waterfront areas. Sustainability, 14(10), 6058. 
Rickles, C. J. (2019). What is leftover: The residual space. Unpublished master dissertation. Georgia Institute of Technology.
http://hdl.handle.net/1853/61319
Saitluanga, B. L. (2014). Spatial pattern of urban livability in Himalayan Region: A case of Aizawl City, India. Social indicators research, 117(2), 541-559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0362-3
Shamsuddin, S., Hassan, N. R. A., & Bilyamin, S. F. I. (2012). Walkable environment in increasing the liveability of a city. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 167-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.025
Stanislav, A., & Chin, J. T. (2019). Evaluating livability and perceived values of sustainable neighborhood design: New Urbanism and original urban suburbs. Sustainable cities and society, 47, 101517.
Tang, H. T., & Lee, Y. M. (2016). The making of sustainable urban development: a synthesis framework. Sustainability, 8(5), 492. 
Tomalty, R., & Mallach, A. (2015). Differences in Livability and Sustainability. In America’s Urban Future (pp. 51-70). Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-597-7_4
Vukmirović, M., Radić, B., Gavrilović, S., & Jovanović, A. (2023, June). Design proposal development for a more liveable open public space. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 1196, No. 1, p. 012077). IOP Publishing.
https://10.1088/1755-1315/1196/1/012077
Wang, Y., Deng, Q., & Ji, S. (2017). Applying Third Place Theory in Mobile Social Media Research: The Physical-Virtual Integration. In CONF-IRM (p. 4).
Wey, W. M., & Huang, J. Y. (2018). Urban sustainable transportation planning strategies for livable City's quality of life. Habitat International, 82, 9-27.
Widjajanti, R., & Wahyono, H. (2018, February). Space livability of street vendors in Simpang Lima public space, Semarang. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 123, No. 1, p. 012045). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/123/1/012045
Yassin, H. H. (2019). Livable city: An approach to pedestrianization through tactical urbanism. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58(1), 251-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2019.02.005
Ye, Y., Wang, Z., Dong, N., & Zhou, X. (2020). Tall Buildings’ Lower Public Spaces: Impact on Health and Behavior. CTBUH J, 1, 26-33. https://www.ctbuh.org/resources/papers/download/4247-tall-buildings-lower-public-spaces-impact-on-health-and-behavior.pdf
Yurui, L., Luyin, Q., Qianyi, W., & Karácsonyi, D. (2020). Towards the evaluation of rural livability in China: Theoretical framework and empirical case study. Habitat International, 105, 102241.
Zamanifard, H., Alizadeh, T., & Bosman, C. (2018). Towards a framework of public space governance. Cities, 78, 155-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.010
Zanella, A., Camanho, A. S., & Dias, T. G. (2015). The assessment of cities’ livability integrating human wellbeing and environmental impact. Annals of Operations Research, 226(1), 695-726.
https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10479-014-1666-7
Zhan, D., Kwan, M. P., Zhang, W., Fan, J., Yu, J., & Dang, Y. (2018). Assessment and determinants of satisfaction with urban livability in China. Cities, 79, 92-101.
Zhang, F., Liu, Q., & Zhou, X. (2022). Vitality evaluation of public spaces in historical and cultural blocks based on multi-source data, a case study of Suzhou Changmen. Sustainability, 14(21), 14040.
Zhang, D., Ling, G. H. T., Misnan, S. H. B., & Fang, M. (2023). A Systematic Review of Factors Influencing the Vitality of Public Open Spaces: A Novel Perspective Using Social–Ecological Model (SEM). Sustainability, 15(6), 5235.
Zalnejad, K., Hossein, S. F., & Alipour, Y. (2019). The Impact of Livable City’s Principles on Improving Satisfaction Level of Citizens; Case Study: District 4 of Rregion4 of Tehran Municipality. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 12(28), 171-183.